Military Base Having Trouble With German-Made Wind Turbine

Share     |   Comments   |   Print

By: Diana T. Barth
Published: 01/17/13

One of the major lessons learned over the past several years by the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) on the Massachusetts Military Reservation might be that it pays to buy local.

One of the duties of that center, formerly the Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment, is to oversee the operation of three wind turbines which were installed to help offset the energy costs of the environmental cleanup of the Upper Cape base.

The first turbine to be erected was the 1.5-megawatt German machine in the southwestern portion of the base, not far from the part of Falmouth where Route 28 and Route 151 intersect. It went up at the end of 2009.

Since then, it has had a series of problems. Assistance with the maintenance of the European-made machine has been hampered by distance, language barriers, and slow response times, said Rose H. Forbes, the turbine project manager. At the time, she said, the major American manufacturer of industrial-scale wind turbines was looking for orders of 10 or more machines and would not supply just one or two.

When it came time to order the two 1.5-megawatt wind turbines now in the northern area of the base, not far from the Market Basket in Sagamore, the wind turbine market had changed, and the program was able to buy American-made turbines. Those turbines went up in November 2011.

Performance of that machine was impacted by lower-than-average wind speeds, a number of mechanical problems, and poor service by the manufacturer, they said.

Not only did those wind turbines perform as expected, US-based General Electric representatives were responsive to any problems or questions that did arise, Ms. Forbes said.

The wind turbine operation is jointly funded by the Air Force and the Army, which have each taken responsibility for the cleanup of different sources of the pollution that affect Cape Cod’s sole source aquifer, sending plumes of contamination into the groundwater.

Electrical costs for the cleanup program ranged from $2 million in 2009, when the first wind turbine went online, to $1.6 million in 2012.

Expectations Not Met

When it went up, the German turbine was expected to offset 25 to 30 percent of the cleanup program’s utility costs and pay for itself within eight years.

From its startup in December 2009 through November 2012, that turbine did not live up to expectations. During that time, it should have produced 11,430 megawatt-hours of electricity; instead it generated 8,040 megawatt-hours. That amount, although less than expected, still resulted in a credit of approximately $1 million and offset carbon dioxide emissions by 5,266 tons, according to AFCEC statistics.

Performance of that machine was impacted by lower-than-average wind speeds, a number of mechanical problems, and poor service by the manufacturer, they said.

Those issues included worn generator brushes and loss of charging capacity in backup systems.

A wind turbine’s “yaw drive” orients the motor housing of a turbine to the wind, and a major component of that drive is a gearbox. Diagnostic evidence suggests that the German gearbox may be failing due to a bad bearing and, possibly, because of poor design, the AFCEC reported.

Ms. Forbes said this week, however, that a “yaw converter error that lasted for over a year” has recently been corrected, at very little expense, and the turbine is currently operating well.

It is currently estimated that it will now take the wind turbine approximately 10 years, or until 2019, to pay for its cost. That might be extended to 11 or 12 years, if the gearbox needs to be replaced.

It is currently estimated that it will now take the wind turbine approximately 10 years, or until 2019, to pay for its cost. That might be extended to 11 or 12 years, if the gearbox needs to be replaced.

Douglas C. Karson, AFCEC community involvement lead, said a rough estimate of the cost of that replacement is between $300,000 and $500,000.

In contrast, the two GE turbines have performed as anticipated. In fact, AFCEC said, they would have performed better than expected except for shutdowns for electrical storms, a two-week shutdown in 2011 at NStar’s request due to work that company needed to perform on its transmission line, and a few minor mechanical problems.

The two turbines were projected to produce 7,620 megawatt-hours annually; over the course of a year they actually produced 7,645 megawatt-hours. In a little more than a year, from November 8, 2011, to November 26, 2012, their operation resulted in a credit of $923,133.

Another tenant of the military reservation, the 6th Space Warning Squadron that operates Pave PAWS, is already working on the construction of its own two 1.5-megawatt wind turbines, not far from AFCEC’s two GE machines. They are expected to offset approximately half of the radar site’s electricity costs.

That squadron, part of the Air Force Space Command, has been taking advantage of the lessons learned by AFCEC.

 

3 Responses to "Military Base Having Trouble With German-Made Wind Turbine "

  1. This speaks volumes to the non-American made turbines in Falmouth. Danish Vestas V82's. The reliability question of these machines are arguably questionable... no matter the Town Hall "spin". Wind 1 has been out of commission since November 21. The night before Thanksgiving, Falmouth Selectmen ordered it shut off for the holiday... 'to offer residents relief' said the chairman of the board. Since, it hasn't operated because of a supposed equipment malfunction. 6 years old and Wind 1 has been 'off-line' 9 weeks! That's a trend Falmouth can hardly afford!

  2. Politicians Out of Touch ! Looking like Fools ? On Jan 17,2013 Lt. Gov. Timothy Murray, U.S. Rep. William Keating and U.S. Rep. Niki Tsongas met at Otis ANG base to discuss how well the wind turbine projects were going on at the base. The Massachusetts Military Reservation (Otis Air Force Base) received and installed its 1.5-MW Fuhrlander turbine in late fall 2009. The turbine has a gear box failure. The cost of the repairs three years later after the warranty costs over 600 thousand dollars . The turbine was built and finished December 15, 2009 The officials at the base deny the gear box has any problems but they are replacing the gear box. This is an example of the bunco scheme going on in the wind industry. Did someone forget to tell our politicians the truth about the ongoing catastrophic gear box failure in the three years old wind turbine ?

  3. Three of the first megawatt industrial wind turbines installed in Massachusetts and Rhode Island have catastrophic gear box failures.The Portsmouth High School ,Rhode Island - Princeton ,Massachusetts -Otis Air force Base ,Cape Cod ,Massachusetts all have millions of dollars in damage . The cost to keep these commercial turbines operating could go as high as one million every three years and these were the first turbines . The FL-1577 started operating on 02 Dec 2009. Regarding the FL-1577 gearbox. We noticed some metal flakes in the gearbox oil this past January and had a borescope inspection done. The inspection showed pitting of the gear teeth caused by pressing the metal flakes between the teeth. The problem component in the gearbox appears to be a bearing. Based on Fuhrlaender's recommendation, we are continuing to run the wind turbine. We are working on procuring a new gearbox that has a different/better bearing. As a key failure point, gearbox reliability continues to dog the wind industry. Its a dirty little secret !

Leave a Reply

In order to comment you need to be logged in.

 

Registered users

Please log in.


I forgot my password

Not registered yet?

Register

 
Follow us on Facebook

Advertisement