I have to give accolades to Selectman Peter Meier for his proposal to help in trying to create a bylaw to help private roads have repairs made by Bourne, and not at the homeowners’ expense on said street.

Years ago it was said that Bourne had about 109 miles of public roads and 111 of private roads. This all came about when the Proposition 2½ bill was passed, legislation that restricted annual property tax increases unless the voters approved an override.

So what did the towns do? They made all roads thereafter built by builders where they had created new homes private roads, so the towns didn’t have to pay for any repairs on those roads.

Here’s the problem with that scenario: those streets are not private regarding who can drive on them. They are open to public domain.

But the real part that is totally and completely unfair is that the owners of those homes have to pay the same property tax rate but do not receive the same support by the town as the people who own homes along public roads.

I did not grow up in Massachusetts but I am amazed that there hasn’t been a class action lawsuit about paying the same property tax rate but not receiving the same ancillary support by the town.

In previous correspondence over the years, I have suggested that if all of us “private” road home owners would always vote “no” on any Proposition 2½ overrides, we could control at least Bourne, because there are more of us living on private roads than home owners on public roads. So no new schools, police stations and whatever, unless we are treated equally.

So my hat’s off to Selectman Meier for proposing a mere $100,000-per-year program. At least that’s a start, and I believe it should be considered at least a $200,000-per-year program to begin with.

Look at the $2 million that was spent building the playground in Buzzards Bay that had to be closed since last year. I look at it this way: the town has previously spent $30,000 for Christmas lights and $50,000 for a study for a bike trail along the railroad tracks. If we’re willing to throw money away for what some people deem important, then why shouldn’t we support funding repairs for our roads that everyone uses? Isn’t that more important than nice but not essential needs?

Daryl K. Smith

Sycamore Avenue

Sagamore Beach

(1) comment


Agreed. This should have happened years ago. Thank you, Peter. Bourne roads are an embarrassment and its residents are already strapped as it is. Priorities need to be established. Public safety should be given priority over the likes of Christmas lights or water parks. More consideration should be given to the wellbeing of the tax paying residents. And then there is the matter of providing tax abatements to those of us who have been stripped of snow plowing services, yet are still being taxed for them. Basically, we are paying twice; we pay privately and we pay the town. I can’t afford to do this. As much as I’d like to, I can’t afford to pay for everyone else’s plowing and then again for my own. It’s one or the other, please. I was under the impression It was against the law to expect payment for a service or item not provided. How is this right? This needs to be addressed. Tax abatements need to be established and retroactive reimbursement needs to be provided all those who have lost town plowing.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.