When it comes to Heritage Museums & Gardens’s aerial adventure park, we agree with Judge Moriarty. It’s not a good fit for the neighborhood. And we’ve said all along that Heritage’s claim—that the treetop ropes course and ziplines are an educational exhibit—is bogus. It’s an adventure course, no more, no less.

When Heritage did not immediately appeal Judge Moriarty’s order to close the park down at the end of last summer, we hoped—perhaps a bit naively—that the case was closed. But then Heritage filed a brand-new application with the town. This time, rather than seek an exception for the park, it is asking the zoning board for a special permit.

Without getting into the regulatory details, what Heritage is trying to do is hit the reset button. Its officials admitted they made mistakes the last time around and they want another chance to state their case. Heritage’s legal counsel feels the special permit avenue is its best bet.

Heritage has said the reasons it brought the adventure park to its property was to stay fresh and attract younger patrons. It’s a struggle many museums are facing these days.

And to Heritage’s credit, it worked. The adventure park was a big hit, but to the detriment of its bucolic setting.

But that does not change the fact that it has been shoehorned into a sleepy neighborhood at the end of a quiet country road. What Heritage has done is force a round peg into a square hole.

Eric Small, who lives near Heritage and is against the adventure park, wrote a letter to the editor this week stating that those opposing the adventure park do not oppose Heritage.

That’s an important distinction that can get easily lost in all this clamor over the ziplines.

Heritage Museums & Gardens is a wonderful attraction. Its grounds, buildings, exhibits, and events are all cherished parts of the community. This weekend, Sandwich High School promgoers will gather in Heritage’s gardens before their big night to mix, mingle, and pose for photographs. It’s the perfect setting. This is what Heritage is.

We know Heritage is trying its best to remain relevant in the modern age. But it must do so while remaining true to what it is. And it’s not an adventure park.

(1) comment

angler

I would have to say that this editorial has hit the nail on the head It is simple to understand It is honest and with out question the only conclusion one can come to if you have been following this process from its first days to its present time. Once again it will be up to the Zoneing board to make a judgment that was shot down by the judges ruling the first time. Perhaps they will have learned a valuable lesson and include all of the many conclusions even our Town Building Department has declared that these platforms are structures . That changes the meaning of the project and has not met the burden of the people living in the area and or not obtained a ruling from Old Kings Highway as to its purpose from a historical point if view . Even if they are approved by the zoning board, they still need to solicit Old Kings Highway and get a letter of approval that it meets all of the historical parameters to open. In both cases me thinks that they will be in violation of what the judge ruled if it is approved again . I can see the judge saying to Sandwich what is it that you did not understand what my ruling was telling every one.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.