Having an independent group of movers and shakers doing its all to attract new business and boost economic development within Sandwich seems like a great idea.

It’s no wonder town officials and residents endorsed the creation of the Sandwich Economic Initiatives Corporation (SEIC) nearly a decade ago.

The thought was that the SEIC, set free from some of the red tape that binds the town’s hands, would be able to maneuver among private developers to negotiate and even strike deals that would drive up tax revenue.

The group was given the authority to raise money and even issue bonds to assist with getting economic development projects off the ground.

In concept, the SEIC seemed a godsend in terms of business growth.

That was the idea, anyway.

But even with the best of intentions, sometimes great ideas fizzle.

So it has been with the SEIC.

In the nine years the SEIC has existed, it has not brought a single project to fruition or generated even one tax dollar for the town.

Members have done a lot of talking and come up with many grand ideas—from launching ferry service from the Sandwich Marina to building a hotel next door to the town’s golf course—but every single one of these has fallen flat.

Part of the problem, as we see it, has been the SEIC’s over-eagerness to hit a grand slam. The group is always swinging for the fences with its proposals. Instead, perhaps its members should have settled for a few base hits.

Another reason for the group’s lack of success is that it seems to have overlooked or outright ignored early warning signs that some of its proposals were doomed to fail. Take, for instance, the ferry service. The Army Corps of Engineers, which owns the marina area and controls the Cape Cod Canal, has been clear from the very start that it would never entertain the idea of a ferry operating out of Sandwich.

It was never going to happen, but still the group pursued the plan.

The hotel at the golf course was also an impossibility. The town was clear with the SEIC that the land there was restricted for recreational or conservation purposes only. So why waste time on it?

Most recently, the SEIC was hot on the idea of bringing artist shanties to either the marina or the village area. Its members reasoned that the shanties would be vibrant additions to the town and would be a huge draw for tourists and their money. It was a lovely idea, but after months and months of fits and starts, the plan fell apart.

The SEIC was supposed to be a money generator. Instead, it ended up costing taxpayers a fair amount during the past nine years.

Some of this cost comes from the amount of work town staff were asked to do at the SEIC’s bidding on various project ideas.

But by far, the largest expense came when the SEIC hired its own consultant. In 2011, after the consultant had done the lion’s share of his work, Town Meeting approved $50,000 to pay at least some of his invoices.

Town officials say that the SEIC still owes the consultant at least another $50,000.

This is not what taxpayers signed up for.

Last year, when the artists shanties’ plan fell apart, SEIC member Robert Prol wrote a scathing letter of resignation to the group’s president. He was one of three members to resign at that time.

In the letter, Mr. Prol freely expressed his frustration over the group’s ineffectiveness.

“Our two-hour meeting last night was enough for me to accept the futility of continuing to serve on the SEIC board,” Mr. Prol wrote. “We wandered aimlessly across well-trod ground—ground we’ve been walking for more than two years.”

“Our meetings have no purpose, no stated outcomes desired, and as a result we are unable to facilitate the discussion to a stated conclusion,” he continued. “As I thought about this last night and into today I accepted that every meeting we’ve had for the past 30 months [has] been the same. A groundhog day of discussions repeated monthly. We blame the town government, yet we haven’t taken any steps to address this.”

Two weeks ago, three other members—the president, vice president and treasurer—announced plans to resign. As of this writing, their resignations have not yet been made official.

It’s time for the town to face facts: the SEIC has been a failed experiment.

It has been a draw on resources and has not produced even a blip on the economic development front.

The group should be dissolved.

(4) comments

angler

I thought the grant money they received was because of the efforts of Mr. Hunts Office am I incorrect?


blackwhale

Correct - but Mr. Hunt went hunting for the grant as part of the SEIC's effort to bring the artist shanty concept to town.


blackwhale

Most volunteer advisory committees could be dissolved with little to no impact on the town - the SEIC is no different in this regard. However, I thought it was important to highlight at least 1 important contribution the SEIC made indirectly. The Sandwich Arts Alliance, whose economic impact is clear, was able to use a state tourism grant of $20,000 to help secure their new building on route 6A. That grant was initially earmarked for the artists shanties and the SEIC played a role in getting it. When the shanty concept failed to materialize, the grant was amended to instead cover the initial costs of acquiring the building for the Arts Alliance.


angler

Great piece of work and should any one like to get even a better view of what has not transpired with the SEIC . Take a look at Last nights meeting where I brought out more of the reasons as to why it was not a success . It is difficult to have some thing bear any fruit when you do not lay the foundation down for it to grow . We can plant as many trees in the ground as we can , however if they are not given the basic nutrients to grow and mature it is all a waist of time and effort. The original concept was good, but when it came to organizing and planing how to carry it all out it never occurred . It almost seems like in some cases they never ever read the enabling document that told them what powers they had . It also explained what some of the items that they carry out , like for example, Bylaws , Obtaining a Corporation seal , Submitting end of year documentation to the Secretary of States Office , Board of Selectmen and place it in a local paper as a public document . It would have been even better had they submitted Corporation filings with the Secretary of State and obtained a filing number as well. Non of which was accomplished in the first 6 years .



That leaves the option where in the enabling documentation it states that if they failed to commence operations with in 6 years after the effective date of this act . that this act shall cease to be effective. So in my humble opinion as a citizen of Sandwich they do not exist for the last three years , even though they have been having meetings with out the benefit of any measure of how they conduct themselves as a corporation


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.